Stop Social Security Privatization! Bush and the House GOP are warming up to privatize social security and gamble your retirement with their Wall Street Cronies. Sign the Pledge to Protect Social Security! Get this ad for your site. Paid for by the DCCC.

Thursday, March 24, 2005

SURPRISE! SOMEONE REMEMBERED THE CONSTITUTION

Yesterday, I posted a blog that essentially reminded readers that the Supreme Court that voted to give GeeDubya the White House was the same band of bretheren that couldn't be trusted to do what was right and decline to hear the Terri Schaivo case.

For once, it gives me great pleasure to state that the Supreme Court actually remembered and read the U. S. Constitution and remembered how much they supported States' Rights. Their refusal to hear this case (for the fifth time) was a good ol' fashioned pimp slap to the Bush Administration; the GOP thugs attempting to use their own "weapon of mass distraction" to get the heat off that cockroach serving in Congress as Majority Leader, and his foibles; not to mention the truckload of DLC members who trotted back to DC to vote to interfere with a personal family decision.

Now, they want to get revenge on the Court for adhering to the concept of governmental checks-and-balances, by getting rid of the filibuster and pushing through Bush's whack-job judicial nominees.

We can breathe a little easier today - the Supreme Court, despite having Thomas and Scalia gracing its bench, did the right thing. But we can't rest on our laurels for too long - this issue needs to be used for opponents of the DLC members in campaign issues from now until 2006.

It might have been better if the GOP had been allowed to subpeona Terri Schiavo and put her in a room at the Rayburn or Cannon Buildings with a C-Span Camera trained on her, just so the Republicans, along with their Republican-lite DLC buddies could be allowed to stoop to new lows and give new meaning to the phrase "looking foolish".

3 Comments:

Blogger Pookie said...

You write about the Terri Schaivo murder case as though you did your homework, when you CLEARLY did NOT. Because if you HAD done your homework you'd know that Michael "dead man walking" Schaivo should NOT be Terri's 'advocate' as he is only an advocate for HIMSELF. He 'pretended' to care about her until he won the lawsuit he filed. THEN he IMMEDIATELY moved her to a hospice (not a rehabilitative facility) and started spending the money designated for her care, on himself. He's an adulterous 'husband', having been shacked up with some other woman (one can only imagine what SHE must be like, to shack up with a guy who has a disabled, helpless wife, it just makes me want to bitch-slap that whore). He's got two bastard kids with that whore. So this makes Michael Schaivo a 'concerned party' when it comes to what is best for Terri????? I'm surprised and disappointed that you (presumably a woman) could support that pigman. My only hope, to which I cling, in regards to this situation is that someone with an opportunity will take it... and do something similar to Michael. Wouldn't THAT be fitting... the murderer is tried and sentenced to death by THIRST, cause that's how he is MURDERING Terri.

It's quite amazing to me that I was ever shortsighted enough to destroy chemical weapons for a living. Now that I am retired (and rich), I think I should be working on developing a chemical weapon that will only kill MALE HUMAN BEINGS. hmmm. Perhaps I shall. Men. Not enough of them are dead. Does this make me equal to Michael? Perhaps. But at least I won't be murdering innocent, helpless people, should I succeed in developing a male-only destructive weapon, but I wouldn't see it that way. I'd see it as a humanitarian effort to rid the world of lowlife beings. Men.

7:44 AM  
Blogger The Christian Progressive Liberal said...

I'm sorry your bitterness towards the whole deal precludes you from allowing full debate on this issue.

I wrote about this issue because I HAVE done my homework. As in having to deal with a similar issue with a loved one who died and told me in no uncertain terms that they did not want to be kept alive by artificial means.

Who can say what they would do in this situation; side with the spouse or the in-laws? All I was trying to communicate is that the Schiavo affair was a private, family issue, and Congress had no right to stick their noses in it. While I may be biased towards Michael Schaivo because of my own experience, IMO, while I believe the Schindlers are loving parents, having a nut case like Randall Terry as their spokesperson does not have them coming out smelling like a rose, either.

If we say we trust God, then we can also trust Him to know WHOSE LYING. My only concern is that Congress keeps their noses out of it.

12:16 PM  
Blogger no-class said...

Unbelievable blog. I can hardly wait to vist this
site again.I'm consistently looking up blogs like
this.
Come as you are and look at my low fee cash advance blog.

8:29 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home